Just thought I would put this out on the forums and see everyone's opinions. I think adding an option to play Ranked Skywars (Team/Solo) and Ranked Survival Games would be good to have as I know myself, there are a lot of people that enjoy the competitive side of playing the minigames. The rank system could be a point system where 1st,2nd and 3rd earn a certain amount of points for their posisition (e.g. 1st: 5 points, 2nd: 3 points, 3rd: 1 point). Then you could have a leaderboard in the Skywars and Survival games lobbies to show your points and the players with the Highest Points(Maybe Top 10). I think this is a good idea for MCC to integrate into their Minigames to make it more interesting. If everyone could comment their opinion below that would be great :) EDIT: In order to stop hackers from hacking on ranked games and winning all the time, you could make it so you have to have played at least 25 non-ranked Skywars games in order to play Ranked Skywars.
I really like this idea Pznda. I have always wanted a ranked leaderboard to go along with the existing wins leaderboard. I feel like there should be an option to play ranked or unranked minigames, because some people just like to chill and play. This would be a good way to organize minigame tournaments as well. Keep up the good ideas.
hi pznda! i can kinda see where you're coming from about about having aa ranked system for minigames, similar to how arenapvp is with ranked and unranked; however, there is a mcc leaderboard, as mentioned by BrysonOA, which you can see by clicking here. and although these leaderboards are not like what you described, they're still a leaderboard n' such. Also, i think having a ranked system could get a bit funky since it's multiple players and there can only be one winner, so would every player who died lose the same amount of 'points' if they died? tbh, i can't give too muchh input since you didn't give a lot of detail on how this would work; like, would this 'ranked' system work similar to arenapvp (kinda how i've been describing things), or would it would completly different? get back to me :) overall, it's a +0 from me Have a good day ~puposaurus
Thank you for your comment. To answer your question: I am going to create a scenario in order to explain the ranked system. This is just an example: - You have 10 players in a Skywars Solo Lobby Ranked - After the game finishes the players position: 1st: Player 1 (+5 Points) 2nd: Player 2 (+3 Points) 3rd: Player 3 (+1 Point) 4th: Player 4 (-1 Point) 5th: Player 5 (-3 Points) 6th: Player 6 (-5 Points) 7th: Player 6 (-5 Points) 8th: Player 8 (-5 Points) 9th: Player 9 (-5 Points) 10th: Player 10 (-5 Points) The reason players coming 6th to 10th will only loose 5 points is because otherwise their points - when they loose - will fluctuate to much and you do not want that as they point system will be chaos. An example of a chaos point system: 6th place = -6 points 7th place = -7 points 8th place = -8 points 9th place = -9 points 10th place = -10 points If a player was to lag out at the very start of the game, then they would instantly loose 10 points which is bad as this would mean they would have to come 1st place the next two game in order to just gain back the points they lost from a stupid issue. See what I mean? EDIT: The same point system that I explained in my first scenario would be the same for both Team/Solo Skywars and Survival Games Please do ask me any other questions
Ranked Skywars would extremely fun and I would actually have a challenge and fight people at my level. The ranking system shouldn't start from 1000 like Arena PvP, it should start from 0 and then work their way up the leaderboard. I respectfully disagree with Pznda for the player points after the game is done. -It should be like this... 1st: Player 1 (+5 Points) 2nd: Player 2 (+4 Points) 3rd: Player 3 (+3 Points) 4th: Player 4 (+2 Points) 5th: Player 5 (+1 Point) 6th: Player 6 (-1 Point) 7th: Player 7 (-2 Points) 8th: Player 8 (-3 Points) 9th: Player 9 (-4 Points) 10th [aka the last] Player 10 (-5 Points) Sometimes when players get knocked off the map, they tend to exit out the server and rejoin so they won't allow the player who knocked them off get the kill. It should still reappear as the player who knocked the other player off the map. Also, the player who got knocked off should earn or lose points depending on their placement. That should be another fix. Thank you and have a good day :D. MCC Diamond Rank (Donater) Discord = JustBeChill#1366
It's a good idea, but I don't think there would really be enough skywars players to achieve this. It would take you forever to unlock ranked games (if the requirement was 100 unranked games), and then you'd be the only one in ranked games, with no one to play against
i feel like this wouldn't work because a 1st player couldve gotten one kill while a 2nd place winner gets 4 kills. it would almost be an unfair ranking because players who win from camping and only kill the final player would get most points while another player gets more kills than them and not even getting most points. Also, if the ranking system was based off kills, i feel that i could feel like mineplex, (from what i remember, it could've changed since) where they make you wait 'til the game has ended to collect your reward and see rankings. if that makes sense.. if i missed anything i can always re-explain/clear it 'up i also agree with what Ankh said, it'd split up the skywars more which can make games take longer to fill up
Yeah it should be simple like win 15 or 20 games not like 100 games. It would take forever for some people.
But Hackers can easily win 20 games. It has to be something that hackers "couldn't be bothered" to do but normal players have mostly already done while playing MCC
Most hackers will probably be banned before 20 games has passed. And if you do manage to meet one in ranked, you can just report them and get them banned, and they'll need to play for another good hour on a new account just to unlock ranked again. 200th post, yay
Having elo for the minigames would make them a lot more fun. It would be nice to have something to work towards in those minigames since I've personally unlocked most of the items and I have 344k credits with no purpose maybe adding ranks/elo to the minigames would increase their popularity and give players something to work towards again in them
Yeah and this might sound dumb but you can pay to move up the ranks with your credits because I have 167k credits and I can spend it on something!
No no no, there is no point of having a ranked system if you can just pay to rank up. The whole point of ranked is to prove your skill not your bank balance.
Yes, I do agree that MCC should have things to the mini-games for players to work towards who already have too many credits. But I do not believe in making a system where players who have 100,000's of credits can just buy new things and then they would automatically have a huge advantage over new players on MCC. Also, in respect to yourself, I very much disagree with the idea that rich players can but their way up to the highest point/elo players. I believe a ranked system is based on skill not how big your bank account is. I personally would like to have the option to edit my Skywars kits in my inventory, as I always have to change my inventory around when I start a new Skywars game.
